VCE History Revolutions exam 2009 reviewed
By Heath McGregor on Nov 12, 2009 in VCE Exams, VCE History - Revolutions
Well…how was it? How was the Revolutions exam?
What did you think of the paper? What was hard? What was easy? How do you think you went?
Let everyone know your thoughts and comments below (please keep them clean!)…cheers
(2 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading ...
James | Nov 13, 2009 | Reply
Very tough exam, especially the France AOS 1 document
Hanna | Nov 13, 2009 | Reply
the fact that France and Russia had two documents caught a lot of people off guard.. and I don’t think it was particularly accurate as it wasn’t testing our ability to analyse visual documents.
It’s a bit disappointing that we didn’t get a visual as a lot of preparation went into this aspect of the exam.
compared to other years, it was a harder exam, but hopefully it will get standardised.
Stuart | Nov 14, 2009 | Reply
Was really not what I was expecting. Definitely one of the hardest exams I’ve ever seen. The essays were quite good however. I just hope that I bluffed my way through it alright.
Steve | Nov 18, 2009 | Reply
This was probabally one of the easiest exams in the past 3 years, there was a lot of fuss from people who didn’t read the study design term properly (especially Russia AOS1). Hope you all went well. Steve
Ben Dover | Nov 27, 2009 | Reply
I answered every question. very easy exam. expecting to get over 89%.SHOULD MAKE EXAM HARDER NEXT YEAR
BEN DOVER
kurt | Nov 12, 2010 | Reply
in the french section 2…the male figure in robes, holding the book facing the national guards…is he a priest or the king…couldn’t decide…he looked identical to the king …but assume he must be of the church…went and said he was the king but now believe I was mistaken…who knows?…the entire PART 2 French was diabolically difficult…